According to Lewis Vaughn’s
philosophical text, ethical relativism is basically the theory that holds that
morality is relative to the norms of one’s culture. That is, whether an activity is
right or corrupt depends on the ethical standards of
the society in which it is practiced. The same activity may
be ethically right in one society but
be ethically off-base in another. This states that there are
no widespread ethical measures, ones that can be all
around connected to all people groups at all times.


While the ethical
traditions of social orders may contrast, the crucial ethical standards basic these methods do
not. For illustration, in a few social
orders, slaughtering one’s guardians after they come
to a certain age was common hone, stemming from
the conviction that individuals were way better off
in the great beyond in the event that they entered it while still
physically dynamic and energetic. While such a tradition would
be condemned in our society, we would concur with these social
orders on the fundamental ethical guideline,
the obligation to care for guardians. Social
orders, at that point, may vary in their application
of essential ethical standards but concur on the


It may be the case
that a few ethical convictions are socially relative though others
are not. Certain practices, such as traditions with respect
to dress and tolerability, may depend
on nearby custom while other traditions such
as servitude, torment, or political restraint, may be administered by all-inclusive ethical measures and
judged off-base in spite
of the numerous other contrasts that exist
among societies. Basically since a few traditions are
relative does not cruel that all traditions are


In case the rightness
or unsoundness of an activity depends on a
society’s standards, at that point it takes after that
one must comply the standards of one’s society and
to veer from those standards is to act corruptly.

This implies that in the event that I am
a part of a society that accepts that racial or
sexist practices are ethically passable, at that point I
must acknowledge those traditions as ethically right.

But such a view advances social similarity and takes
off no room for ethical change or enhancement in
a society. Moreover, individuals of the same society may
hold diverse perspective on practices. My point is
that widespread ethical benchmarks can
exist indeed in case a
few ethical hones and convictions shift among societies.

In other words, we can recognize social contrasts in ethical methods and convictions and
still hold that a few of
these hones and convictions are ethically off-base.

The method of servitude in pre-Civil War America is
considered ethically off-base in spite of it being socially satisfactory