Hillary Clinton Speech Analysis On September 5, 1995, Hillary Rodham Clinton delivers an influential speech regarding the universal women’s egalitarian rights issues. Clinton intends to focus on general global complications concerning women: education, health care, occupations, critical legal and human rights, and political participation. By addressing her notion in Beijing, China, Hillary expresses her objective to audiences across the world, but primarily concentrates this goal on the women residing in China.
Hillary utilizes evocative word choice, sympathetic tone, and anaphoric sentence structure throughout her speech to efficiently convey her objective. Hillary Clinton applies evocative diction throughout her speech to effectively focus on worldwide human rights affairs regarding females. Hillary proclaims, “It is a violation of human rights when women are doused with gasoline, set on fire, and burned to death…It is a violation of human rights when young girls are brutalized by the painful and degrading practice of genital mutilation” (Page 4, Paragraphs 4 and 7).
A cruel implication is established with the use of the words “doused” and “brutalized. ” The audience will acknowledge that women are deprived of their human rights through these ruthless conducts, and the brutal activities will evoke a sense of guilt. The consciousness of misconduct will also arouse unification among the listeners, who will unite and attempt to grant women the human rights they are entitled to by prohibiting such acts from occurring. Furthermore, Hillary articulates, “It was one of America’s most divisive philosophical wars” (Page 5, Paragraph 1).
The word “America” and the phrase “philosophical wars” evoke listeners to consider America’s introspective struggles. The United States is internationally a dominant and influential nation; therefore, countries including China can evaluate the hassles of America and acquire knowledge from it. If similar strategies are used from America, the commoners can collaborate to grant women the human rights they deserve. Hillary expresses a sympathetic tone to focus on the women’s rights misfortunes. She asserts, “The great challenge of this conference is to give voice to women everywhere whose experiences go unnoticed, whose words go nheard. Women comprise more than half the world’s population, 70% of the world’s poor, and two-thirds of those who are not taught to read and write” (Page 2, Paragraph 6). Clinton acknowledges the women’s aspirations: to be recognized and noted for significant experiences. However, these ambitions are not being fulfilled and Hillary integrates specific statistics to elucidate the insignificance of females in society. This issue illustrates that equality rights regarding females are negligible, and an opposite approach must be engaged.
Also, Hillary proclaims, “They are watching their children succumb to malnutrition caused by poverty and economic deprivation. They are being denied the right to go to school by their own fathers and brothers. They are being forced into prostitution, and they are being barred from the bank lending offices and banned from the ballot box” (Page 3, Paragraph 1). Clinton is evaluating each aforementioned area of complications including education, health care, occupation, and political participation. By sharing the hardships of females with her audience, Hillary directly exposes the viewers to a sense of wrongdoing.
Through this, she intends for her listeners to consolidate and take action into resolving the complications. Hillary Clinton incorporates anaphoric syntax to effectively convey the global women’s rights issues. She states, “It is a violation of human rights…It is a violation of human rights…” (Page 4, Paragraphs 2-8). Each anaphora is followed by an abusive act that transgresses the concept of human morals. Prior to the list of cruel acts, Hillary explains that the abuses are a continuation from the past due to “a history of silence. ” Therefore, the anaphora parallels women’s abusive past to the abuses notable in the present.
It exhibits that if action isn’t taken to hinder the immoral acts now, then they will continue to emerge in the future. Furthermore, Clinton declares, “I have met new mothers in Indonesia…I have met working parents in Denmark…I have met women in South Africa…I have met…” (Page 2, Paragraph 5). She is paralleling her opportunity to learn about the challenges facing women to real lifestyles of people in different parts of the world. This shows that women are facing different complications depending on what area they live in. By constantly stating that she has met people from around the world, Hillary explains that she has observed how ifferent areas of the world have different values and standards for women. Therefore, those who are pursuing women’s equality must be aware of all these complications. Hillary Clinton utilizes evocative word choice, sympathetic tone, and anaphoric syntax to effectively convey her purpose: to focus on general global complications concerning women: education, health care, occupations, critical legal and human rights, and political participation. She addresses her speech in Beijing, China, to explain her objective to the entire world, but mainly directing on the Chinese population. Overall, Hillary Clinton successfully conveys her purpose.