Essay is descriptive, rather than analytical. Structure and flow of argument needs work 3 Clear examples of own leisure & attempt made to link to a concept of leisure. Understands concepts 3 Discussion somewhat shallow. Answer does not refer to material in reading. Structure and flow of argument needs work Good attempt at discussing three concepts & attributing ideas to correct author’s. Sound integration of literature into analysis. Structure could be strengthened in places to communicate argument clearly & succinctly. Clear examples of own leisure that are linked to two of the concepts of leisure & shows analytical understanding of the concepts used 4 Good attempt at cussing why agricultural conflict needs addressing by managers. Sound integration of literature into argument.. Structure could be strengthened in places to communicate analysis clearly & succinctly. 4 Describes an example of a positive & a negative experience & shows understanding of cross cultural communication in which they occurred Three concepts are discussed with critical analysis of the author’s Ideas evident.
Demonstrates excellent Integration of findings/theory from literature. Argument Is both logical and wildcatters 5 Clear examples of own assure linked to all three conceptual dimensions discussed In an analytical & critical way 5 A rich and critical discussion of why managers need to address cross-cultural conflict and how sensitivity/insensitivity cross cultural communication can impact on others.
Demonstrates excellent integration of findings/theory from reading 5 Describe one positive and one negative experience, observed that demonstrates sensitively/longevity’s shown In cross cultural communication 5 Shows a wallpapered understanding of both Western and Chinese meanings of leisure Mark 0-1 use of clear examples of own leisure to demonstrate understanding of concepts 5) No clear examples of own leisure, Does not understand concepts 0-1 ESSAY 2 Clear discussion on why leisure professionals need to understand deferent cultural groups (5) No clear understanding of topic.
Little or no attempt to form a logical discussion. 2 Some clear examples of own leisure, but not linked to concepts so shows superficial understanding of concepts 2 Some attempt at building a discussion, though mostly descriptive and lacking flow or structure. U-1 Describe personal experiences In regards to cross cultural communication & provide clear egg. Of a positive & a negative experience that demonstrates sensitivity/ insensitivity. (5) No example of a negative and positive own experience; nor links to cross cultural communication. Describes a personal experience but does not identify as neither negative nor positive nor links to cross cultural communication. 2 Shows limited understanding of Western and Chinese meanings of leisure 3 Describes both a positive & negative group experience & mentions agricultural communication. 0-1 ESSAY 3 Compares and contrasts the Western meanings of leisure with the Chinese meaning of leisure (5) Unfocused discussion of leisure that does not answer the question.
Able to contrast the western and Chinese meanings of leisure but does not compare them (what they may have in common) 4 Sound discussion of all concepts that goes beyond simple description to analysis supporting your point of view 0-1 Able to articulate meaning of leisure that comes closest to how you conceive of leisure? (5) Does not address own meaning of leisure. No example. Does not appear to understand the question 0-1 2 Addresses own meaning of leisure but no example.
Does not refer to other meanings 3 Addresses own meaning of leisure with example but only compares to other Western meanings of leisure 3 Own meaning of leisure is presented with a relevant example. Shows clearly that own meaning is closest to one of the Western or Chinese meanings of leisure 4 5 Own meaning of leisure is presented with a rich example that illustrates clearly own meaning is close to one of the Western or Chinese meanings of leisure and distant from the others Clarity of written expression, appropriate length with correct use of grammar (5) Lacks structure.
Syntax, punctuation, grammar & spelling poor. Essay question too snort (less Tanat 2/0 words) u Some structuring of material. Syntax, punctuation, grammar & spelling need attention. Essay question too long (more than 440 words) 2 Some referencing but not consistent or accurate. 2 Demonstrates good structure without too many errors in syntax, punctuation, grammar & spelling.