Rather than avian room for criminals we pay money to keep prisoners on death row for life, It’s a waste of money! In prisons Death Row inmates have single cells, with televisions and being pitied. Criminals on Death Row are on life sentences for a specific reason because they can’t be civil. Crime rates in the Golden State are high because we allow prisoners to have better lifestyles in prisons rather than out In the free world. 1. By families having closure means that seeing the person(s) put death would only be fair. Other words “Eye for an eye”.

Someone takes someone else’s life then their life would be garnished as well. 2. A majority of the problem In California Is too many prisoners on Death Row. Having too many people means fewer places for other criminals. Why keep a man alive whose killed and killed and killed no explanation. 3. By having a Death Penalty crime rates would decrease, people would not want to be committed of killing cause they would die as well. CONS 1. Many say It Is useless, It would not bring a lost one back to life. 2. Violates our Constitutional Right (Cruel and Unusual punishment). 3.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Cost of taxpayers of capital rimes are 2-3 times more than It Is for keeping them Incarcerated for life. 4. By killing someone for killing someone dose not show right from wrong. 5. Possibility of killing Innocent Inmates. 6. Being Incarcerated for life Is worse and more deterrent. 7. Mental Ill Inmates maybe put to death. As It shows this argument for the Death Penalty will always remain as an argument. It Is controversial In all aspects. It violates rights, Is financially expensive. It dose not show right from wrong. ‘Why should the government be able to kill somebody, because somebody killed somebody?

There Is no right and wrong answer to these pros and cons. Another shows no gain for the vellums loved one. It Is obvious that there loved one can’t rise from the dead. So why do It? 2. Cruel and unusual punishment Is a right for all citizens of America. And by being sentenced the Death penalty It violates that right. Any type of death (n execution, hanging or Injection) all falls under that right. Pros and Cons By coaches having room for criminals we pay money to keep prisoners on death row for life, it’s a prisoners to have better lifestyles in prisons rather than out in the free world. By should be garnished as well. 2. A majority of the problem in California is too many 1. Many say it is useless, it would not bring a lost one back to life. 2. Violates our crimes are 2-3 times more than it is for keeping them incarcerated for life. 4. By killing someone for killing someone dose not show right from wrong. 5. Possibility of killing innocent inmates. 6. Being incarcerated for life is worse and more deterrent. 7. Mental ill inmates As it shows this argument for the Death Penalty will always remain as an argument. It is controversial in all aspects.

It violates rights, is financially expensive. It dose not show right from wrong. “Why should the government be able to kill somebody, because somebody killed somebody’? There is no right and wrong answer 1. By it being useless, killing an individual for killing another shows no gain for the victims loved one. It is obvious that there loved one can’t rise from the dead. So why do it? 2. Cruel and unusual punishment is a right for all citizens of America. And by being sentenced the Death penalty it violates that right. Any type of death (n execution, hanging or injection) all falls under that