The Emancipation Proclamation is avital part of our nation’s history, and it was a turning point during the CivilWar Era of the United States. Lincoln issued the proclamation in order to freethe slaves in rebel states, and this action also strengthened the Union.
Afterthe proclamation was issued, any countries that supported the Confederacy wereseen to support slavery. Therefore, the countries that were strictlyanti-slavery cut ties with the rebel states, and the power of the Unionincreased as a result. The main point of the Emancipation Proclamation was thatthose who were enslaved in rebel states were to be freed.
This action affectedthe Union as well as the Confederacy, although they were both affected in differentways. The Union received support from anti-slavery countries, and theConfederacy lost the support they originally had from these anti-slaverycountries because of these countries’ refusal to associate with slavery.Basically, the Emancipation Proclamation turned the Civil War from a warindirectly driven by the slavery topic into a war based solely on the legalityof slavery in certain areas of the United States. The articles being reviewedtoday are written by authors Louis P.
Masur and Barry Schwartz. Louis P. Masur is William R. KenanJr. Professor of American Institutions and Values at Trinity College inHartford. In his article Liberty is aSlow Fruit: Lincoln the Deliberate Emancipator, Masur analyzes the detailsthat caused the Emancipation Proclamation to make the change in history that itdid.
He describes the series of events as well of the opinions of many peopleon the document itself. The article is well organized, as it is clearlyorganized in a way that does not jump around and is easy to understand. Theauthor answers the questions that he sets out to answer, and he thoroughly analyzesthe aspects of the topic.
The article is well-written and easy to understand,as the words used are easily understood and it is easy to comprehend the messageabout which the author is writing. The article is also not too lengthy, whichmakes it easier to read since it is more concise. The author makes agreeablepoints, as the article is based primarily on facts and it is difficult to arguewith history. There is not an obvious bias in the article, although Masur clearlysupports the effect that the Emancipation Proclamation made on Americans. The authorgets his evidence from no other obvious sources other than historical facts andevents, and he uses his own writing techniques to write about these events in adescriptive way.
The vocabulary in the article is not extremely extensive, andthe words used are easy to understand. The lack of complicated words makes foran article that is not too difficult to comprehend and is overall moreenjoyable to read. There are not any obvious ways that the author could improvethis article, as it is short, well-worded, and pleasant to read.
Barry Schwartz is the DorwinCartwright Professor of Social Theory and Social Action at Swarthmore College.In his article The EmancipationProclamation: Lincoln’s Many Second Thoughts, Schwartz presents the factsof many of the causes and effects that happened due to the establishment of theEmancipation Proclamation. The article has many different elements and coversmultiple topics that pertain to the document. Therefore, much of theinformation gets blended together due to the overload of facts and is notparticularly well-organized. The author answers all of the questions that hesets out to answer, but they are answered in a way that is not very clear and canbe confusing to the reader. The fact that there is so much information used toanswer these questions and that the article is quite extensively writtenovershadows the actual answers to the questions that are presented.
The articleis not particularly well-written, as it is wordy, lengthy, and dull, and it canbe boring to read because of the droning tone used to describe the sequence ofevents listed. The combination of these factors makes the article difficult tounderstand as well. The author makes agreeable points, as they are based mostlyon facts about real, historical events and cannot really be argued. There is nomajor bias in this article, because it is based almost solely on the facts ofthe Emancipation Proclamation. The author gets his information from the worksof other authors, and there are multiple citations throughout the article thatstate the sources for this piece of work. The vocabulary that is used in this articleis not complex in itself, but the combination of the semi-extensive words makesthe article difficult and complicated.
The author could improve his article byshortening it, because the reader easily loses interest when reading. Schwartzcould also improve his article by using a more simplified vocabulary so thatthe reader can make more sense of what is being said in the article. Overall,the article was extensively written, and the information presented isoverbearing. Between the two articles beingreviewed, Liberty is a Slow Fruit: Lincolnthe Deliberate Emancipator by Louis P. Masur was the more enjoyable articlebecause of its concise presentation of information and its less extensive vocabulary.The article was well-written and well organized, which made it more pleasant toread altogether. The article TheEmancipation Proclamation: Lincoln’s Many Second Thoughts by Barry Schwartzwas less enjoyable, mainly because it was extremely lengthy and had avocabulary that was difficult to comprehend at times.
Overall, both of thearticles present facts that are essential to understanding the importance of theEmancipation Proclamation. Masur’s article provides simpler information that iseasier to comprehend, while Schwartz’s article has information that is moreextensive and in-depth.