The Inhumanity of the South though the union blamed more on ?allegiance and backwardness?a more so than out right Inhumane treat meant of the slaves. Though Slaves were at the time considered private property to the Individual owner, and with label of property is what enraged the south so much when the North wanted to take it away, in a sense taking away what they rightfully own. The South?was entire economy was supported by slave labor; they felt that if slavery were to be taken away that they would have a rapid decline In production. ?We can only live & exists by that species of labor: and hence I am willing to antique to fight to the last The south would have preferred to live as a ?Dual heirs of the Revolution,?a but the north refused to allow any states to succeed the Republic because ?once admit that a state can secede at will, and republican government by majority rule would come to an end (30). ?ј The union was going to stop at nothing to defeat the South because if they did not win, then the Republic would have dissipated and slave labor would have taken of the Industrial North Compromising Jobs and Income for many of the Northerners.

One thing that infinite the North were the ?Twenty Negro Laws,?џ which stated that southern Plantation owners who owned more a Twenty count of slaves were exempted from the war draft. From the Southern land owners perspective this was thought needed necessary to not only look after the slaves but continue productions whilst the war was prevalent. In the end the north mostly benefited from this because the laws caused, ?Class tensions that a number of historians have Identified as undermining Confederate unity and morale. ?o The upper class plantation owners id not want to be drafted so this law prevented that but causing the middle and lower classes to question the Rich?was determination and loyalty in defending their home land. A dirt farmer from North Carolina wrote ?cell they care for is to keep the poor men run away from home and they lay at home feasting on the Gooding of the land (15). ?0 The north was not only fighting to abolish slavery but they were fighting for ?preservation of one nation Indivisible. ?o Though many Northerners were Tort racial equality, majority AT ten Norton Delve Just more In ten anta-slavery aspect.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

These anti-slavers typically wanted more protecting of the Union of the north and the south rather than equality of White man and the slaves. The north also unlike the south had the support of the enslaved and freed slaves. An Illinois lieutenant said , ?CE I have 11 Negroes in my company now?: not less than 75 men that will carry guns that did not before we got the Some Southerners wanted to allow blacks to fight as well but many others felt that this was not necessary so the south never introduced slaves into their forces.

Once Lincoln introduced his second confiscation act during July, 1862, the north began to have its win mild division of the matters of the war being for Unity and not against slavery. An artillery Major from New York said, ?Cathie war [must be] for the preservation of the Union, the putting down of armed rebellion, and for that purpose only (61). ?0 He also stated that, ?cachet cause of Union united northern soldiers; the cause of emancipation divided them (61). ?0 After the Emancipation Proclamation the Union began to lean towards fighting more for the slaves than the protection of the Union. Lincoln wrote in a message to congress that ?cell giving freedom to the slave, we sure freedom to the free (63). ?0 Though the Proclamation caused much controversy in the north, the decline in moral was ?cohort lived, for the Union armies did not fall apart and soon won some of their most decisive victories (64). ?0 The abolishing of slavery to the North would ?exceeding labor; that fact of itself will revolutionize everything (67). ?0 The free labor of the slaves would only compromise the growth of the American Nation. James M. McPherson has done an excellent Job in representing both perceptions of the civil war and What the North and the South ought for, the north being partly the abolition of slavery but mostly the protecting of their Union, their Indivisible Country.